Skip to content

Local operators, radial quantization, and the OPE

The scaling lesson associated a dimension with the power of a correlation function. Here that same dimension becomes an energy: logarithmic distance from an insertion plays the role of Euclidean time. This gives us a practical way to organize local operators and expand products of nearby insertions.

Work in a unitary conformal field theory in d=3d=3 or 44, continued to Euclidean space. There is no supersymmetry assumption. We use a conformally invariant vacuum, normalized correlation functions, and the usual radial Hilbert space with a discrete spectrum on the sphere. Coincident-point contact terms are excluded unless explicitly discussed. A local operator may be an elementary field, a renormalized composite, or another localized insertion; it need not create one elementary particle.

Write a nonzero position as x=rnx=r n, where n⋅n=1n\cdot n=1. Introduce a positive length LL and a dimensionless coordinate

τ=log⁡(r/L),r=Leτ.\tau=\log(r/L),\qquad r=L e^\tau.

Since n⋅dn=0n\cdot dn=0, differentiating xx gives

dsflat2=dr2+r2dΩd−12=r2(dτ2+dΩd−12)=(rL)2dscyl2,ds_{\rm flat}^2=dr^2+r^2d\Omega_{d-1}^2 =r^2(d\tau^2+d\Omega_{d-1}^2) =\left(\frac rL\right)^2ds_{\rm cyl}^2,

where

dscyl2=dt2+L2dΩd−12,t=Lτ.ds_{\rm cyl}^2=dt^2+L^2d\Omega_{d-1}^2,\qquad t=L\tau.

Thus a coordinate change followed by a Weyl rescaling produces a cylinder with spatial sphere radius LL. A dilation r↦esrr\mapsto e^s r becomes t↦t+Lst\mapsto t+Ls. The origin and infinity become the two ends t→−∞,+∞t\to-\infty,+\infty. Merely changing coordinates would leave the factor (r/L)2(r/L)^2 in the metric; conformal covariance is what allows the cylinder description.

Let DD be the dimensionless dilation generator, with D∣0⟩=0D|0\rangle=0. Evolution through an annulus of radius ratio r2/r1r_2/r_1 is

U(r2,r1)=e−log⁡(r2/r1)D=e−(t2−t1)(Hcyl−Evac),Hcyl−Evac=DL.U(r_2,r_1)=e^{-\log(r_2/r_1)D} =e^{-(t_2-t_1)(H_{\rm cyl}-E_{\rm vac})}, \qquad H_{\rm cyl}-E_{\rm vac}=\frac DL.

We identify energy gaps. A vacuum-energy contribution from the curved-space definition of the stress tensor, including an even-dimensional Weyl anomaly, is not being set to zero. The cylinder map and normalized Weyl prescription are described in Simmons-Duffin v1, §6.4, (90)–(94).

There is a direct action check. For the ordinary free scalar set δ=(d−2)/2\delta=(d-2)/2 and χ(τ,n)=rδϕ(rn)\chi(\tau,n)=r^\delta\phi(rn). Its flat action becomes

S=12∫dτ dΩd−1[(∂τχ−δχ)2+(∇Ωχ)2].S=\frac12\int d\tau\,d\Omega_{d-1} \left[(\partial_\tau\chi-\delta\chi)^2 +(\nabla_\Omega\chi)^2\right].

The powers cancel because rdr−2r−2δ=1r^d r^{-2}r^{-2\delta}=1. Expanding the square, the cross term is the boundary contribution −δ∫dΩ [χ2]/2-\delta\int d\Omega\,[\chi^2]/2. For fields with vanishing endpoint contribution, the remaining cylinder action is

S=12∫dτ dΩd−1[(∂τχ)2+(∇Ωχ)2+δ2χ2].S=\frac12\int d\tau\,d\Omega_{d-1} \left[(\partial_\tau\chi)^2+(\nabla_\Omega\chi)^2 +\delta^2\chi^2\right].

The constant angular mode therefore has frequency δ\delta in τ\tau, or energy gap δ/L\delta/L. The term δ2χ2\delta^2\chi^2 is essential: a minimally coupled massless scalar placed arbitrarily on a cylinder would be a different action.

Organize derivatives into a conformal family

Section titled “Organize derivatives into a conformal family”

Use the Euclidean charge convention [Pμ,O(x)]=∂μO(x)[P_\mu,\mathcal O(x)]=\partial_\mu\mathcal O(x), with no factor of ii. It is a convention for Euclidean conformal charges, not the Hermitian Lorentzian momentum convention of the supersymmetry lessons. In this section measure coordinates in units of LL.

Besides translations PμP_\mu and dilations DD, let MμνM_{\mu\nu} generate rotations and KμK_\mu generate special conformal transformations. The needed algebra is

[D,Pμ]=Pμ,[D,Kμ]=−Kμ,[Kμ,Pν]=2δμνD−2Mμν,[Mμν,Pρ]=δνρPμ−δμρPν.\begin{aligned} [D,P_\mu]&=P_\mu,& [D,K_\mu]&=-K_\mu,\\ [K_\mu,P_\nu]&=2\delta_{\mu\nu}D-2M_{\mu\nu},& [M_{\mu\nu},P_\rho]&=\delta_{\nu\rho}P_\mu-\delta_{\mu\rho}P_\nu. \end{aligned}

A scalar primary at the origin obeys

[D,O(0)]=ΔO(0),[Kμ,O(0)]=0,[Mμν,O(0)]=0.[D,\mathcal O(0)]=\Delta\mathcal O(0),\qquad [K_\mu,\mathcal O(0)]=0,\qquad [M_{\mu\nu},\mathcal O(0)]=0.

The last condition is replaced by a spin representation for a nonscalar primary. Primaries and their translation descendants form a conformal family. These definitions and signs follow Simmons-Duffin, (32)–(37), (49)–(53).

Insert O(0)\mathcal O(0) in the path integral inside a sphere. The result is a state on that sphere, denoted ∣O⟩|\mathcal O\rangle. In a vacuum annihilated by the conformal charges, the commutator equations give

D∣O⟩=Δ∣O⟩,Kμ∣O⟩=0.D|\mathcal O\rangle=\Delta|\mathcal O\rangle,\qquad K_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle=0.

Now apply a translation:

DPμ∣O⟩=[D,Pμ]∣O⟩+PμD∣O⟩=(Δ+1)Pμ∣O⟩.D P_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle =[D,P_\mu]|\mathcal O\rangle+P_\mu D|\mathcal O\rangle =(\Delta+1)P_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle.

Repeating gives dimensions Δ+n\Delta+n for nonzero level-nn descendants. In position space they are derivatives such as ∂μO\partial_\mu\mathcal O and ∂μ∂νO\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\mathcal O. A derivative is generally not another primary:

KμPν∣O⟩=2Δδμν∣O⟩.K_\mu P_\nu|\mathcal O\rangle =2\Delta\delta_{\mu\nu}|\mathcal O\rangle.

The right side is nonzero for a nonidentity scalar with positive Δ\Delta. Derivatives supply excited states of the same conformal family, rather than unrelated scaling data.

Conversely, a sphere state can be evolved inward and expanded in dilation eigenstates, which define insertions at the origin. This is the state–operator correspondence under the Hilbert-space assumptions stated above; see §6.1–§6.3, (84)–(89). It organizes local-operator states, not a massive-particle scattering spectrum.

For a scalar primary choose the conformally transported cylinder operator

Ocyl(t,n)=(rL)ΔOflat(rn).\mathcal O_{\rm cyl}(t,n) =\left(\frac rL\right)^\Delta\mathcal O_{\rm flat}(rn).

Take a Hermitian scalar with flat two-point function C/∣x1−x2∣2ΔC/|x_1-x_2|^{2\Delta}. Since

∣r1n1−r2n2∣2=2r1r2[cosh⁡ ⁣(t1−t2L)−n1⋅n2],|r_1n_1-r_2n_2|^2 =2r_1r_2\left[\cosh\!\left(\frac{t_1-t_2}{L}\right)-n_1\cdot n_2\right],

we obtain

⟨Ocyl(t1,n1)Ocyl(t2,n2)⟩=C{2L2[cosh⁡((t1−t2)/L)−n1⋅n2]}Δ.\boxed{ \langle\mathcal O_{\rm cyl}(t_1,n_1) \mathcal O_{\rm cyl}(t_2,n_2)\rangle =\frac{C}{\left\{2L^2[\cosh((t_1-t_2)/L)-n_1\cdot n_2]\right\}^{\Delta}}.}

It depends on the time difference, as required by cylinder translations. At positive separation u=(t1−t2)/Lu=(t_1-t_2)/L and c=n1⋅n2c=n_1\cdot n_2, factor out eue^u:

⟨OcylOcyl⟩=CL2Δe−Δu[1+2Δc e−u+O(e−2u)].\langle\mathcal O_{\rm cyl}\mathcal O_{\rm cyl}\rangle =\frac{C}{L^{2\Delta}}e^{-\Delta u} \left[1+2\Delta c\,e^{-u}+O(e^{-2u})\right].

The first exponential measures the gap Δ/L\Delta/L; the next has gap (Δ+1)/L(\Delta+1)/L. Angular dependence selects which descendants contribute. At c=0c=0, for example, the level-one contribution vanishes without removing those states from the theory. At short separation with n1=n2n_1=n_2, 2L2(cosh⁡u−1)∼(t1−t2)22L^2(\cosh u-1)\sim(t_1-t_2)^2, recovering the local flat-space singularity.

Why unequal primary dimensions are orthogonal

Section titled “Why unequal primary dimensions are orthogonal”

Translations, rotations and scaling alone allow

G(x)=⟨O1(x)O2(0)⟩=C12∣x∣−(Δ1+Δ2).G(x)=\langle\mathcal O_1(x)\mathcal O_2(0)\rangle =C_{12}|x|^{-(\Delta_1+\Delta_2)}.

For a scalar primary the special conformal action is

[Kμ,O(x)]=[2xμ(x⋅∂+Δ)−x2∂μ]O(x).[K_\mu,\mathcal O(x)] =\left[2x_\mu(x\cdot\partial+\Delta)-x^2\partial_\mu\right]\mathcal O(x).

The second insertion at the origin is killed by KμK_\mu. Invariance of the vacuum therefore requires the displayed differential operator with Δ=Δ1\Delta=\Delta_1 to annihilate GG. Writing s=Δ1+Δ2s=\Delta_1+\Delta_2, use x⋅∂G=−sGx\cdot\partial G=-sG and ∂μG=−sxμG/x2\partial_\mu G=-s x_\mu G/x^2. The result is

0=(2Δ1−s)xμG=(Δ1−Δ2)xμG.0=(2\Delta_1-s)x_\mu G =(\Delta_1-\Delta_2)x_\mu G.

Thus either Δ1=Δ2\Delta_1=\Delta_2 or C12=0C_{12}=0. This selection rule uses special conformal symmetry and primarity, not dimensional analysis alone. It is the Ward identity (64).

For equal dimensions, a basis of independent scalar primaries can be chosen orthonormal under their positive two-point matrix. Complex operators are paired with their conjugates, and charges impose additional selection rules.

Positivity is easiest to see radially. In units L=1L=1, the radial adjoint of a Hermitian scalar insertion is

O(x)†rad=∣x∣−2ΔO ⁣(xx2).\mathcal O(x)^{\dagger_{\rm rad}} =|x|^{-2\Delta}\mathcal O\!\left(\frac{x}{x^2}\right).

It reflects cylinder time, since r↦1/rr\mapsto1/r sends τ↦−τ\tau\mapsto-\tau. For a complex operator the right side contains its internal conjugate. Consequently

⟨O∣=lim⁡r→∞r2Δ⟨0∣O(rn),⟨O∣O⟩=C.\langle\mathcal O| =\lim_{r\to\infty}r^{2\Delta}\langle0|\mathcal O(rn), \qquad \langle\mathcal O|\mathcal O\rangle=C.

Here the dual formula is written for the Hermitian scalar. Reflection positivity gives C>0C>0 for a nonzero state. In this radial inner product D†=DD^\dagger=D, Pμ†=KμP_\mu^\dagger=K_\mu, and Mμν†=−MμνM_{\mu\nu}^\dagger=-M_{\mu\nu}, as in §7.2, (108)–(116). For a unit-normalized scalar primary,

⟨O∣KμPν∣O⟩=2Δδμν.\langle\mathcal O|K_\mu P_\nu|\mathcal O\rangle =2\Delta\delta_{\mu\nu}.

This gives a positive descendant norm when Δ>0\Delta>0. A stronger level-two test appears in Exercise 3.

Replace two nearby insertions by local operators

Section titled “Replace two nearby insertions by local operators”

Suppose Oi(x)\mathcal O_i(x) and Oj(0)\mathcal O_j(0) lie inside a sphere centered at 00 and all other insertions lie outside. Thus ∣x∣|x| is smaller than every other insertion’s distance from 00. The inside path integral prepares a state on the separating sphere. Expanding that state in primary and descendant states gives

Oi(x)Oj(0)=∑kCijk(x,∂)Ok(0).\mathcal O_i(x)\mathcal O_j(0) =\sum_k\mathcal C_{ij}{}^k(x,\partial)\mathcal O_k(0).

This is the operator product expansion, or OPE. The index kk labels primaries; the differential operator C\mathcal C packages their descendants. Its validity is inside correlation functions in the separating-sphere domain. In the usual unitary radial setting the expansion converges there; it is not a prescription for multiplying fields at exactly coincident points. See §8, (136)–(142).

For a scalar exchanged primary of dimension Δk\Delta_k, scaling fixes its leading coefficient to be proportional to ∣x∣Δk−Δi−Δj|x|^{\Delta_k-\Delta_i-\Delta_j}. It does not fix the proportionality constant. Spinful terms carry angular tensors as well. The remaining constants, after choosing two-point normalizations, are dynamical CFT data.

A free scalar supplies a calculation with every coefficient visible. Let

⟨ϕ(x)ϕ(0)⟩=Ad∣x∣d−2,Ad=1(d−2)vol⁡(Sd−1).\langle\phi(x)\phi(0)\rangle=\frac{A_d}{|x|^{d-2}}, \qquad A_d=\frac{1}{(d-2)\operatorname{vol}(S^{d-1})}.

This is the normalization derived in the preceding lesson. Set φ=ϕ/Ad\varphi=\phi/\sqrt{A_d}, so that ⟨φ(x)φ(0)⟩=∣x∣−2δ\langle\varphi(x)\varphi(0)\rangle=|x|^{-2\delta} with δ=(d−2)/2\delta=(d-2)/2. Normal ordering, denoted by colons, subtracts free self-contractions. Define

O2=: ⁣φ2 ⁣:2.\mathcal O_2=\frac{:\!\varphi^2\!:}{\sqrt2}.

There are two pairings between the fields at xx and 00, hence

⟨O2(x)O2(0)⟩=221∣x∣4δ.\langle\mathcal O_2(x)\mathcal O_2(0)\rangle =\frac{2}{2}\frac1{|x|^{4\delta}}.

The operator has unit two-point normalization and dimension 2δ2\delta. It is a scalar primary: the free scalar is primary, and the flat normal-ordered product at the origin has no nonzero special-conformal variation.

Wick contraction separates the singular identity term:

φ(x)φ(0)=1∣x∣2δ1+: ⁣φ(x)φ(0) ⁣:.\varphi(x)\varphi(0) =\frac1{|x|^{2\delta}}\mathbf1+:\!\varphi(x)\varphi(0)\!:.

Taylor expanding the uncontracted first field then gives

φ(x)φ(0)=1∣x∣2δ1+2 O2(0)+12xμ∂μO2(0)+⋯ .\boxed{ \varphi(x)\varphi(0) =\frac1{|x|^{2\delta}}\mathbf1 +\sqrt2\,\mathcal O_2(0) +\frac1{\sqrt2}x^\mu\partial_\mu\mathcal O_2(0) +\cdots .}

We used : ⁣(∂μφ)φ ⁣:=∂μ: ⁣φ2 ⁣:/2:\!(\partial_\mu\varphi)\varphi\!: =\partial_\mu:\!\varphi^2\!:/2. The leading OPE coefficient is 2\sqrt2, not one; it remembers the chosen normalization of the composite. At order x2x^2 and beyond, further descendants and other primaries, including operators with spin, must be organized. The ellipsis is not asserted to contain only derivatives of O2\mathcal O_2.

Taking the vacuum expectation value keeps only the identity term. Testing the same expansion against a distant O2\mathcal O_2 instead isolates the composite family, as the next exercise shows.

1. Read the free scalar energies from its action

Section titled “1. Read the free scalar energies from its action”

On the unit angular sphere, scalar harmonics obey −∇Ω2Yj=j(j+d−2)Yj-\nabla_\Omega^2Y_j=j(j+d-2)Y_j with integer j≥0j\geq0. Expand the field χ\chi in those harmonics and find the physical cylinder energy gaps. Check d=3d=3 and d=4d=4. Explain what would go wrong if the δ2χ2\delta^2\chi^2 term were dropped.

Hint 1

Each harmonic coefficient is a Euclidean oscillator in τ\tau. Add its angular eigenvalue to the mass coefficient in the derived action.

Hint 2

Use d−2=2δd-2=2\delta to complete a square. Physical time is t=Lτt=L\tau.

Solution

The squared oscillator frequency is

ωj2=j(j+d−2)+δ2=(j+δ)2.\omega_j^2=j(j+d-2)+\delta^2=(j+\delta)^2.

Since d>2d>2, the positive frequency is j+δj+\delta, so

Ej−Evac=j+(d−2)/2L.E_j-E_{\rm vac}=\frac{j+(d-2)/2}{L}.

The lowest gaps are 1/(2L)1/(2L) in three dimensions and 1/L1/L in four dimensions. Adding jj derivatives gives exactly these higher gaps. For the free field, the equation ∂2φ=0\partial^2\varphi=0 removes trace descendants; symmetric traceless derivatives account for the angular harmonics. They do not represent additional independent scalar primaries.

Dropping δ2\delta^2 would give j(j+d−2)/L\sqrt{j(j+d-2)}/L, including a zero-frequency constant mode. That is not the dilation spectrum of the free flat-space CFT. In positive-sphere curvature conventions the conformal coupling checks the missing coefficient:

ξcRcyl=d−24(d−1)(d−1)(d−2)L2=δ2L2.\xi_c R_{\rm cyl} =\frac{d-2}{4(d-1)} \frac{(d-1)(d-2)}{L^2} =\frac{\delta^2}{L^2}.

Here RcylR_{\rm cyl} is positive; it is not the opposite curvature convention used by the three-manifold target paper.

2. Measure the OPE coefficient with a third insertion

Section titled “2. Measure the OPE coefficient with a third insertion”

Calculate ⟨φ(x1)φ(x2)O2(x3)⟩\langle\varphi(x_1)\varphi(x_2)\mathcal O_2(x_3)\rangle by Wick contraction. Then set x1=xx_1=x, x2=0x_2=0, x3=zx_3=z with ∣x∣<∣z∣|x|<|z| and expand through first order in xx. Compare with both displayed nonidentity OPE terms.

Hint 1

The two fields inside the normal-ordered composite cannot contract with each other. Count how many ways they can contract with the two external fields.

Hint 2

Expand ∣z−x∣−2δ|z-x|^{-2\delta}, and differentiate ⟨O2(y)O2(z)⟩=∣y−z∣−4δ\langle\mathcal O_2(y)\mathcal O_2(z)\rangle=|y-z|^{-4\delta} with respect to yy, setting y=0y=0 afterward.

Solution

Two Wick pairings survive, giving

⟨φ(x1)φ(x2)O2(x3)⟩=2∣x1−x3∣2δ∣x2−x3∣2δ.\langle\varphi(x_1)\varphi(x_2)\mathcal O_2(x_3)\rangle =\frac{\sqrt2}{|x_1-x_3|^{2\delta}|x_2-x_3|^{2\delta}}.

For the chosen positions this becomes

2∣z∣4δ[1+2δx⋅zz2+O ⁣(∣x∣2∣z∣2)].\frac{\sqrt2}{|z|^{4\delta}} \left[1+2\delta\frac{x\cdot z}{z^2} +O\!\left(\frac{|x|^2}{|z|^2}\right)\right].

The identity OPE term contributes zero because ⟨O2(z)⟩=0\langle\mathcal O_2(z)\rangle=0 in this vacuum. The primary term contributes 2/∣z∣4δ\sqrt2/|z|^{4\delta}. The derivative term contributes

xμ2∂yμ∣y−z∣−4δ∣y=0=4δ2x⋅z∣z∣4δ+2,\frac{x^\mu}{\sqrt2} \left.\partial_{y^\mu}|y-z|^{-4\delta}\right|_{y=0} =\frac{4\delta}{\sqrt2} \frac{x\cdot z}{|z|^{4\delta+2}},

which is precisely the linear term above. Both the normalization and the descendant coefficient have been tested by a different correlator.

The condition ∣x∣<∣z∣|x|<|z| permits a sphere enclosing 0,x0,x while excluding zz. Approaching or crossing the other insertion invalidates this particular expansion domain; it does not invalidate the exact three-point function.

For a unit-normalized scalar primary use the displayed conformal algebra and Pμ†=KμP_\mu^\dagger=K_\mu to compute the norm of P2∣O⟩P^2|\mathcal O\rangle, where P2=∑ν=1dPνPνP^2=\sum_{\nu=1}^dP_\nu P_\nu. Derive the scalar unitarity bound for Δ>0\Delta>0, and interpret its saturation in the free example.

Hint 1

Commute one KμK_\mu through both translations. The rotation generator annihilates the primary but does not annihilate Pν∣O⟩P_\nu|\mathcal O\rangle.

Hint 2

Summing the rotation commutator gives ∑νMμνPν∣O⟩=(d−1)Pμ∣O⟩\sum_\nu M_{\mu\nu}P_\nu|\mathcal O\rangle=(d-1)P_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle. Then apply the remaining KμK_\mu and sum μ\mu.

Solution

Expanding the first commutator gives

KμP2∣O⟩=∑ν([Kμ,Pν]Pν+Pν[Kμ,Pν])∣O⟩=[2(Δ+1)−2(d−1)+2Δ]Pμ∣O⟩=4(Δ−d−22)Pμ∣O⟩.\begin{aligned} K_\mu P^2|\mathcal O\rangle &=\sum_\nu\left([K_\mu,P_\nu]P_\nu +P_\nu[K_\mu,P_\nu]\right)|\mathcal O\rangle\\ &=\left[2(\Delta+1)-2(d-1)+2\Delta\right] P_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle\\ &=4\left(\Delta-\frac{d-2}{2}\right)P_\mu|\mathcal O\rangle. \end{aligned}

Therefore

∥P2∣O⟩∥2=8dΔ(Δ−d−22).\boxed{ \|P^2|\mathcal O\rangle\|^2 =8d\Delta\left(\Delta-\frac{d-2}{2}\right).}

Nonnegative norms require Δ≥(d−2)/2\Delta\geq(d-2)/2 when Δ>0\Delta>0. The separate Δ=0\Delta=0 case has vanishing first descendants; with a unique conformal vacuum it is the identity sector. This level-two test is the scalar case discussed in §7.3, Exercise 7.4 and (131).

At Δ=(d−2)/2\Delta=(d-2)/2, the trace descendant has zero norm. In the positive Hilbert space it is removed as a null state. Under the state–operator map this is the equation ∂2φ=0\partial^2\varphi=0 away from other insertions. It does not erase the contact source in the propagator: the distributional equation for a time-ordered or radially ordered two-point function still includes its delta function.

A local scaling dimension now has three linked meanings: a correlation exponent, an eigenvalue of DD, and a cylinder energy gap times LL. Before using an OPE, specify the normalized operators and a sphere centered at the expansion point that separates their insertions from the rest. Before counting a conformal family, check whether any descendants are null. Continue to what BPS and protected mean to use those norms in a supersymmetric shortening argument.