Equation index
Use a paper number when you are reading a source, and a site label when you are returning to a calculation here. For example, the paper’s (8.11) and the site’s (O09.2) belong to different numbering systems. A map connects their arguments; it does not assert that the formulas are identical in every convention or away from a stated limit.
The tables below are also used in the paper companions. They give selected, checked landmarks and their teaching homes. Open the linked guide for its notation dictionary, omitted steps and exit calculations. The version beside each paper is the version used for its equation numbers; printed page numbers and PDF page numbers may differ by one or more pages.
Follow a source equation to its derivation and back
Section titled “Follow a source equation to its derivation and back”Suppose you need the curved D-term prescription in P, equation (6.13).
-
Open the Section 6 map under Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds. Its (6.13)–(6.14) row sends you to the D-term prescription.
-
Read the calculation immediately above that anchor. The general multiplet must be neutral, and the background terms complete its highest component:
The lesson exhibits its variation as a divergence, using . A globally defined integrand and vanishing integrated boundary flux are still required for an invariant action.
-
Follow the lesson’s source link back to P v3, printed page 24/PDF page 25. Check the neutral charges and the coefficient in (6.13). You have recovered both the formula and the conditions behind it.
This is a lookup exercise, not a second derivation of the prescription. Its full proof belongs to the linked lesson.
Keep the qualification attached to the formula
Section titled “Keep the qualification attached to the formula”An equation label cannot replace a convention check. The Section 8 map distinguishes the printed fixed-shift free-chiral expression from a fixed-R-charge family. The Seiberg–Witten map keeps the electric-charge and period units together. The four-sphere guide explains the physical versus equivariant mass. The ABJM and Fermi-gas guides retain the contour, phase, approximation and source-correction qualifications.
For an exact site equation already in your notes, follow its linked label in a map or use the site’s search with that label. The tables concentrate on useful paper-to-lesson connections rather than repeating every displayed formula. Unnumbered derivations remain available through their section links.
Paper equations and teaching calculations
153 landmarks
Open a paper to see its checked passages. A paper number and a site number identify different equations; the reading question explains their connection. Directions such as “below” refer to the linked guide.
Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds (P, v3)
Open the pinned paper, v3. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds
Introduction: identify every term
| Read in v3 | What to identify | Detailed teaching calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (1.1), printed 3/PDF 4 | Which quantities are potentials and which are dual field strengths? | The dual background fields |
| (1.2), printed 3/PDF 4 | Why is the central charge different from an R charge? | Fields and their units |
| (1.3), printed 3/PDF 4 | Why must a zero gravitino also have zero variation? | Preserving the frozen background |
| (1.4)–(1.5), printed 4/PDF 5 | Which signs change between the two charge sectors? | Both Killing spinor equations |
Reading Supersymmetric Field Theories on Three-Manifolds
A map through the rest of the paper
| Paper passage and checked landmark | Reading goal | Teaching route |
|---|---|---|
| Section 2: (2.15), printed 10/PDF 11 | Recover the rigid gravitino variation from current/source couplings. | The R-multiplet and the supplied variation |
| Section 3: (3.1)–(3.8), printed 10–12/PDF 11–13 | Separate differential uniqueness, pointwise bilinears and global spin/R lifts. | The Section 3 guide maps the full argument and reconstructs a spinor from its charged bilinear. |
| Section 4: (4.1)–(4.21), printed 12–16/PDF 13–17 | Follow transverse integrability into a local spinor and then global patching. | The Section 4 guide maps the construction and checks a cylinder-to-annulus overlap with its spin and R seams. |
| Section 5: (5.1)–(5.14), printed 17–20/PDF 18–21 | Distinguish opposite-charge pairs, maximal local enhancement and global transport. | The Section 5 guide |
| Section 6: (6.1), printed 21/PDF 22; (6.32), printed 29/PDF 30 | Read the source-dependent algebra and then check an action. | Section 6 guide, with the full component/action map and a compensated R/flavor-source calculation |
| Section 7: (7.1), printed 30/PDF 31 | Compare the first-order curved coupling with flat current operators. | Section 7 guide reconstructs a current preimage and tests its first-order scope, building on the canonical flat-space check. |
| Section 8: (8.2)–(8.3), printed 34/PDF 35 | Relate the real sphere response to a separated-point correlator, retaining the source and contact prescription. | The Section 8 guide connects squashing response with the free-chiral check. |
| Appendices A and B | Look up conventions, then the definitions used by the transverse geometry. | The Appendices A/B guide maps the conventions and reconstructs the spin-curvature identity; its separate geometry entrance introduces the compatible connection. |
| Appendices C and D: (C.1), printed 43/PDF 44; (D.1)–(D.19), printed 45–48/PDF 46–49 | Compare the four-dimensional construction with its twisted reduction. | The Appendices C/D guide maps the complete reduction. The four-dimensional rigid background derives (C.1); twisted reduction derives the 3d source and multiplet dictionary. Neither branch is a prerequisite for the introduction. |
Paper guide: Section 2, currents and rigid backgrounds
Read from operators to sources
| Read in v3 | Question to resolve | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (2.1)–(2.2), printed 6/PDF 7 | How do a linear-multiplet constraint and a conserved vector fit together? | R-multiplet constraints and components; the simpler linear package |
| (2.3), printed 6/PDF 7 | Which operators change when the R-current is improved? | Flavor improvement of the components and the associated curvature coupling |
| (2.4)–(2.7), printed 7/PDF 8 | What does the full superspace integral pair, and what has Wess–Zumino gauge removed? | The two superfield expansions |
| (2.8)–(2.9), printed 7/PDF 8 | Which source transformations are gauge redundancies, and which fields are dual field strengths? | The dual background fields |
| (2.10), printed 8/PDF 9 | Which combination actually sources the R-current? | The linear component coupling |
Paper guide: Section 2, currents and rigid backgrounds
From source transformations to a rigid symmetry
| Read in v3 | Question to resolve | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (2.11), printed 8/PDF 9 | Why must a supersymmetry transformation be accompanied by a transformation restoring Wess–Zumino gauge? | The linearized reconstruction |
| (2.12)–(2.13), printed 9/PDF 10 | Why does making the spinor parameter local produce a derivative in the gravitino variation? | Local parameters and the gravitino source |
| (2.14)–(2.15), printed 9–10/PDF 10–11 | Which covariant terms can survive when the gravitini are zero? | The supplied transformation |
| (2.15), then (1.4)–(1.5) | Why must a zero source also have zero variation? | Preserving the frozen background and both spinor equations |
Paper guide: Section 3, geometry from one spinor
Read the whole section in three stages
Paper guide: Section 4, transverse holomorphic geometry
Read the necessity argument first
Paper guide: Section 5, additional supercharges
Read in two passes
| Read in P v3 | Question for your notes | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (5.1)–(5.2), printed 17/PDF 18 | Which terms cancel in the derivative? | M07.2–M07.4: mixed vector |
| (5.3)–(5.5), printed 17/PDF 18 | Where is reality imposed? Which vector is normalized? | M07.7–M07.9: real direction |
| (5.6)–(5.7), printed 17–18/PDF 18–19 | Do both labels use the same sources? | M07.11–M07.12: a complete pair |
| After (5.7), printed 18/PDF 19 | Does the chosen flow close? | M08.1: exceptional-fiber model |
| (5.8), printed 18/PDF 19 | Is curvature annihilating a line or a basis? | R09.4: full obstruction |
| (5.9)–(5.10), printed 19/PDF 20 | What is local, and what remains global? | M09.3: enhancement conditions |
| (5.11)–(5.12), printed 20/PDF 21 | Are radius and squashing conventions matched? | M10.2: homogeneous family |
| (5.13)–(5.14), printed 20/PDF 21 | Which base curvature does each case require? | M09.3 and its local cases |
Paper guide: Section 6, curved multiplets and actions
Systematic actions
Paper guide: Section 7, the linearized check
Read the comparison in two stages
| P v3 passage | What to establish | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (7.1)–(7.2), printed 30/PDF 31 | Fix the metric variation, the three source couplings and the selected spinor. | Expansion and supercharge, R08.1 |
| (7.3)–(7.5), printed 30–31/PDF 31–32 | Distinguish closed operators from explicit supersymmetry variations. | A fermionic preimage, R08.2–R08.5; the additional preimage below |
| (7.4), footnote 11 | Translate complex components without losing factors of two. | Adapted coordinates and the explicit dictionary below |
| (7.6)–(7.7), printed 31/PDF 32 | Integrate derivatives onto the sources and check the field-strength constraint. | The small metric background, R08.6–R08.7; the flat-metric source direction below |
| Paragraph after (7.7), printed 32/PDF 33 | Identify the unproved nonlinear step. | The limits of first-order exactness, R08.9 |
| (7.8)–(7.10), printed 32/PDF 33 | Compare the vector currents with the YM and FI actions; understand the absence of an explicit CS contribution to this multiplet. | Gauge kinetic terms and curved CS/FI terms |
| (7.11)–(7.13), printed 33/PDF 34 | Keep , the chosen R improvement and the nonminimal stress tensor together. | The chiral curvature check, R08.8, and stress-tensor improvements |
Paper guide: Section 8, physical observables
Response capstone: follow the equation map
| Paper equations | Role in the argument | Where to reconstruct the step |
|---|---|---|
| (8.1) | Define the complex free energy. | Source derivatives, (O06.1), fixes the response sign for . |
| (8.2) | Relate its real round-point Hessian to . | Squashing response, (O08.9). |
| (8.3) | Define the R-current coefficient and its stress-tensor partner. | Current correlators, (O07.2), (O07.7)–(O07.9); the last equations define any conversion to . |
| (8.4)–(8.5) | Specify the metric and auxiliary sources, in a positive- branch. | Squashing response, (O08.2), (O08.6). |
| (8.6) | Identify the first-order current insertion. | Squashing response, (O08.3); use , not the matter derivative's . |
| (8.7)–(8.8) | Convert the Hessian into an integrated correlation with local terms. | Source derivatives, (O06.1), and squashing response, (O08.4)–(O08.5). |
| (8.9)–(8.10) | Weyl-map the correlator and introduce chordal distance. | Squashing response, (O08.7)–(O08.9), includes the regulated integral omitted in the paper. |
| (8.11) | Give the printed free-chiral integral. | Free-chiral response, (O09.2)–(O09.5), distinguishes its fixed shift from fixed R-charge. |
| (8.12) | Evaluate the free round Hessian. | Free-chiral response, (O09.6)–(O09.11), gives the integral, spectral subtraction and . |
| (8.13)–(8.14) | Check a separate leading large- supergravity regime. | Exit calculation 2 below checks the implication and its limits; these are not general free-field formulas. |
Paper guide: Appendices A and B, conventions and geometry
Read the conventions by operation
| Source passage | Operation to check | Canonical explanation |
|---|---|---|
| (A.1)–(A.2), printed 38/PDF 39 | Raise an index without conjugating; reverse odd products under adjunction. | Index contraction and independent Euclidean variables |
| (A.3)–(A.4), printed 38/PDF 39 | Keep the oriented Clifford product and the lowered gamma indices distinct. | Gamma multiplication and ordered Fierz identity |
| (A.5)–(A.6), printed 38/PDF 39 | Identify which Grassmann coordinates are differentiated and which top coefficient is integrated. | The superspace expansion; this is a later application, not extra preparation for the curvature calculation |
| (A.7)–(A.9), printed 38–39/PDF 39–40 | Translate the input-first connection and the Ricci contraction. | Frame covariance and the explicit curvature trace |
| (A.10)–(A.12), printed 39/PDF 40 | Reduce spin curvature to the Ricci tensor in three dimensions. | Sphere spin connection, followed by the reconstruction below |
| (A.13)–(A.14), printed 39/PDF 40 | Distinguish transport of a spinor from transport of a mixed tensor. | The spin rotation in the curved algebra and the tensor Lie derivative |
Paper guide: Appendices A and B, conventions and geometry
Read the geometric definitions with their hypotheses
| Source passage | What is, and is not, asserted | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (B.1)–(B.2), printed 40/PDF 41 | A one-form , vector and endomorphism obey pointwise almost contact identities; compatibility adds a metric. | The algebraic definitions, M02.1–M02.3 |
| (B.3)–(B.6), printed 40–41/PDF 41–42 | A metric-compatible connection preserving generally has torsion and a free one-form . | The connection dictionary immediately below; spinor connection construction |
| (B.7), printed 41/PDF 42 | The paper selects one representative of that freedom for its later background construction. | Adapted-frame derivatives, M05.4–M05.6, and the subsequent source solution |
| (B.8)–(B.11), printed 41–42/PDF 42–43 | A projector condition preserves the transverse complex line and supplies local holomorphic coordinates. | The projector and the local coordinate argument, M03.9 and M03.12–M03.13 |
| (B.12)–(B.14), printed 42–43/PDF 43–44, footnote 14 | Compatible adapted metrics have a conformal transverse plane, with a fixed symmetric-product and volume convention. | The metric components, M04.2–M04.5, and overlaps, M04.6–M04.7 |
| (B.15) and the three closing comments, printed 43/PDF 44 | A local choice of a new distinguished direction is different from preserving a given direction; global extension is additional. Normality is stronger than the projected condition. | Scope of integrability and exit 3 below |
Paper guide: Appendices C and D, four-dimensional origin
Read the background before the component table
| Paper landmark | Question it answers | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (C.1) | Which fixed sources preserve a spinor? | New minimal equations, (B02.4)–(B02.5). |
| (C.2)–(C.3) | What transforms, and which algebra closes? | Twisted reduction, (B03.12)–(B03.15); read the component dictionary before applying the table. |
| (D.1)–(D.2) | Which direction is removed, and how are dotted indices identified? | Twisted reduction, (B03.4) and its frame discussion. |
| (D.3)–(D.7) | How do the metric, frame and horizontal components reduce? | Twisted reduction, (B03.1)–(B03.2), (B03.5). |
| (D.8)–(D.11) | Where do central charge, spin rotations and curvature terms come from? | Twisted reduction, (B03.3), (B03.6), and the curvature check following (B03.14). |
| (D.12)–(D.16) | Which source identification avoids an extra spinor projection? | Reduction source dictionary, (B03.7)–(B03.9). |
| (D.17)–(D.18) | Which three-dimensional fields and derivatives enter the transformations? | Twisted reduction, (B03.12)–(B03.14). |
| (D.19) | How does translation along the fiber become a central transformation? | Twisted reduction, (B03.15). |
Monopole Condensation, And Confinement In N=2 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory (SW1, v1)
Open the pinned paper, v1. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading the first Seiberg–Witten paper
Read the low-energy argument
| Passage in v1 | Question to answer while reading | Canonical preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Section 2.2, (2.6), p.6/PDF 7 | Why are inequivalent vacua labeled by one complex invariant? | Solve the vacuum equation. |
| Section 2.3, (2.7)–(2.16), pp.6–9/PDF 7–10 | Which couplings belong to the same prepotential, and where does the scale enter? | The local prepotential action and the running scale. |
| Section 3.2, (3.18)–(3.21), p.14/PDF 15 | Why does the dual photon use and ? | Dualize the whole multiplet. Section 3.3's gravity extension can wait. |
| Section 4, (4.3)–(4.5), p.17/PDF 18; decay discussion, pp.19–20/PDF 20–21 | What is the exact central charge, and what additional question determines stability? | The physical BPS bound and the marginal threshold. |
| Section 5.1, (5.1)–(5.4), pp.21–22/PDF 22–23; sections 5.4–5.5, (5.7)–(5.15), pp.26–27/PDF 27–28 | How do a weak-coupling logarithm and a light monopole constrain continuation around punctures? | The light-field threshold and based monodromy paths. |
Reading the first Seiberg–Witten paper
Read the curve and the periods as one specification
| Landmark in v1 | Object to identify | Teaching home |
|---|---|---|
| (6.6), p.35/PDF 36 | The cubic family and its degenerations | Reconstruction inputs. |
| (6.7), (6.14), pp.35–36/PDF 36–37 | Cycle ordering and period ordering | The sheet and oriented periods. |
| (6.15)–(6.20), pp.37–38/PDF 38–39 | A meromorphic differential whose vacuum derivative is holomorphic | Find and normalize the differential. |
| (6.22)–(6.23), p.39/PDF 40 | The two complete-cycle integrals | Evaluate the oriented periods. |
| (6.24)–(6.30), pp.39–40/PDF 40–41 | Weak coupling and the monopole limit | The local period expansion. |
| “The Spectrum,” pp.40–41/PDF 41–42 | Why monodromy is not a proof of an unchanged stable spectrum | Supply the spectral information. |
Monopoles, Duality and Chiral Symmetry Breaking in N=2 Supersymmetric QCD (SW2, v1)
Open the pinned paper, v1. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading the second Seiberg–Witten paper
A selected reading order
| Paper passage | Question to answer | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Convention note, (1.6), pp. 5–6 | Which period changes when the elementary electric label becomes an integer? | Charge dictionary |
| (3.1), p. 10; (5.3), p. 19 | Does the central charge reproduce the actual fundamental mass? | Matter mass |
| (6.1)–(6.4), p. 20; (15.1)–(15.4), pp. 51–52 | Why can massive periods acquire additive flavor shifts? | Differential and residues |
| (11.1)–(11.7), pp. 37–38; (12.5)–(12.8), p. 45 | Why does removing a fundamental produce a different pure curve? | Heavy-flavor limit and the reconstruction below |
| (16.1)–(16.3), p. 56; (16.10), p. 58 | Which normalization is used for the adjoint theory? | Adjoint periods and coupling |
| (16.17)–(16.25), pp. 61–63 | Which modulus and scale stay fixed in the adjoint decoupling limit? | Two different limits |
Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops (PES, v3)
Open the pinned paper, v3. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading Pestun's four-sphere localization paper
Read the argument in this order
| Source passage | Question to answer | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (1.1), p. 2; (2.18)–(2.19), p. 13 | Which scalar accompanies the connection, and which spinor preserves the equatorial loop? | The circle's supersymmetry condition |
| (2.2)–(2.6), p. 9; (2.12)–(2.14), pp. 11–12; Appendix B, pp. 44–45 | How do the conformal spinor and curvature term enter? | Solve the sphere spinor equations |
| (2.26)–(2.33), pp. 15–16; Appendix C, pp. 45–50 | What closes off shell for the selected charge, and what does its square do? | Identify the selected square and auxiliaries |
| (3.16)–(3.18), pp. 19–20 | Why is a tempting extra smooth scalar branch excluded? Which auxiliary survives? | The Bianchi-identity test |
| (3.19), p. 21 | Why is the classical coefficient proportional to three, rather than two? | Evaluate the physical auxiliary action |
| (4.20)–(4.22), p. 27; (4.39)–(4.46), pp. 30–32 | Which unpaired modes determine the ratio, and why are the two pole expansions different? | Normal fluctuations and their signed index |
| (4.47)–(4.50), p. 33; (4.58)–(4.59), pp. 34–35 | When do vector and hypermultiplet weights actually cancel? | The determinant product |
| Section 5, pp. 36–39; especially (5.11) and footnote 9 | Which mass vanishes in N=4, and what happens to the polar sectors? | The shifted mass and the nonempty sectors |
| Return to (1.2)–(1.4), p. 3 | How are the trace and the finite-dimensional integral normalized? | Finite-color evaluation and central-mode removal |
N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals (AB, v4)
Open the pinned paper, v4. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading the original ABJM paper
Read the action and its symmetry argument
| Verified passage | Question to answer | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (2.1)–(2.2), printed pp. 3–4/PDF pp. 4–5 | Which vector fields have algebraic equations rather than Yang–Mills kinetic terms? | Opposite levels and complete multiplets |
| (2.4)–(2.6), printed pp. 5–6/PDF pp. 6–7 | How does eliminating the two adjoint chirals fix the relative sign and coefficient? | Recover the coefficient |
| (A.1)–(A.4), printed p. 30/PDF p. 31 | Why is the F-term potential only part of the answer? | Eliminate the vector auxiliaries |
| (A.5)–(A.7), printed p. 31/PDF p. 32 | Which ordered sextic invariants combine into an expression? | A finite R-symmetry rotation |
| Section 2.2 after (2.6), printed p. 6/PDF p. 7 | What acts on the supercharges, rather than only on scalar polynomials? | Full-action enhancement |
Reading the original ABJM paper
Read the vacuum and operator arguments
| Verified passage | Question to answer | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Section 2.3, (2.7)–(2.9), printed pp. 7–8/PDF pp. 8–9 | Why does the phase quotient remain finite? | Compact dualization |
| Paragraph after (2.9), printed p. 8/PDF p. 9 | What is permuted on the diagonal branch? | Permute whole tuples |
| Section 2.4, (2.10) and footnote 6, printed pp. 10–11/PDF pp. 11–12 | Which flux cancels which matter charge? | Derive the CS gauge weight |
| Section 2.4, printed pp. 11–12/PDF pp. 12–13 | Which further input makes the special operators into symmetry currents? | Protection and nonzero descendants |
| Sections 2.5–2.6, printed pp. 13–15/PDF pp. 14–16 | Why are the variants separate global theories? | The global group matters |
Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Superconformal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter (KWY, v4)
Open the pinned paper, v4. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading three-dimensional localization with matter
Read the reduction in this order
| Checked source landmark | Reading question | Canonical explanation |
|---|---|---|
| (3.1)–(3.5), pp. 7–9 | Which positive deformation and contour select the locus? | Deformation identity |
| (3.10)–(3.20), pp. 10–11 | Which zero modes and gauge volumes remain? | The remaining scalar |
| (3.21)–(3.30), pp. 12–13 | Why does an extra Vandermonde double count? | Completed gauge measure |
| (3.39)–(3.58), pp. 15–18 | Which multiplicities survive cancellation? | Paired factors |
| (3.60)–(3.67), pp. 18–19 | What fixes the constant and phase? | Finite determinant prescription |
| (3.68)–(3.69), p. 20 | How do the measure and insertion combine? | Normalized integral |
Reading three-dimensional localization with matter
The ABJM application
| Source landmark | What to reconstruct | Canonical location |
|---|---|---|
| (2.13) and section 2.2, pp. 6–7 | Curved matter and the superconformal input | Curvature completion |
| (3.5), (3.37), pp. 9, 15 | Vector zero modes and vanishing matter | The locus |
| (4.2)–(4.4), pp. 20–21 | Two conjugate pairs per color pair | Bifundamental weights |
| (3.69), (4.1), pp. 20–21 | Node and normalized representation | Loop insertion |
| (4.5)–(4.9), pp. 21–22 | A perturbative expansion with its phase | Finite-rank contour check |
ABJM theory as a Fermi gas (FG, v3)
Open the pinned paper, v3. Read the associated guide for its conventions and the limits of the comparison.
Reading ABJM as a Fermi gas
A reading order with questions to answer
| Passage | Reading question | Canonical calculation |
|---|---|---|
| Introduction (1.3)–(1.4), p. 3; Section 2, especially (2.1), p. 5 | Which parameter is fixed, and which normalized integral is being transformed? | Specify the limit |
| Section 3.1, (3.1)–(3.5), pp. 9–10 | Where do the exchange sign, the single remaining factorial and the kernel measure come from? | Cauchy identity and Fourier integrations |
| (3.6)–(3.16), pp. 10–11 | Why is a cycle trace different from a fixed-particle partition function? | Occupation statistics |
| (3.17)–(3.34), pp. 12–13 | What operator has the required eigenvalues, and why is its Hamiltonian not exactly a sum of two functions? | The one-particle operator |
| Sections 4.1–4.2, (4.1)–(4.27), pp. 17–20 | How does a spectral count lead to a filled-state free energy? | Count and fill levels |
| Section 5.2, (5.25)–(5.37), pp. 25–27 | Which three coefficients enter the cubic grand potential, and what information is lost on discarding its remainder? | Separate the three inputs and invert the cubic |
| Section 5.3, (5.38), p. 27, and (5.64)–(5.68), p. 31; footnote 3, p. 32 | What is established in the WKB expansion, and which proposal for the constant term is withdrawn? | Quantum counting input and absolute normalization |
| Section 5.4, especially (5.74)–(5.80), p. 33 | What lies beyond a power expansion in the auxiliary Planck constant? | The omitted exponential sectors |