Skip to content

Circle bundles and the Hopf fibration

The monopole connection in Connections, flux, and holonomy needed two potentials on a two-sphere. What if we attach the missing phase angle as an actual circular direction? For unit flux, the resulting three-dimensional space is a three-sphere, with a round metric that we can reconstruct explicitly.

Use the geometry of the round three-sphere for its ambient coordinates and global frame. This lesson is geometry on a positive-definite three-manifold. It assumes no Killing spinor or supersymmetric background fields. A circle direction or a bundle number by itself does not count preserved supercharges. The same geometry can also appear as a spatial slice or a factor of a four-dimensional spacetime.

Combine the dimensionless coordinates of the unit three-sphere into two complex numbers:

z1=y0+iy1,z2=y2+iy3,∣z1∣2+∣z2∣2=1.(T10.1)z_1=y^0+iy^1,\qquad z_2=y^2+iy^3, \qquad |z_1|^2+|z_2|^2=1. \tag{T10.1}

They are ordinary coordinates, not spinor fields. The physical round metric has radius ℓ>0\ell>0 and is ds2=ℓ2(∣dz1∣2+∣dz2∣2)ds^2=\ell^2(|dz_1|^2+|dz_2|^2) restricted to the constraint. Define the map

π(z1,z2)=n=(2Re⁡(zˉ1z2), 2Im⁡(zˉ1z2), ∣z1∣2−∣z2∣2).(T10.2)\pi(z_1,z_2)=\mathbf n =\left(2\operatorname{Re}(\bar z_1z_2),\, 2\operatorname{Im}(\bar z_1z_2),\, |z_1|^2-|z_2|^2\right). \tag{T10.2}

Its image lies on a unit two-sphere because ∣n∣2=4∣z1∣2∣z2∣2+(∣z1∣2−∣z2∣2)2=1|\mathbf n|^2=4|z_1|^2|z_2|^2+(|z_1|^2-|z_2|^2)^2=1. The common phase rotation

(z1,z2)⟼(eiλz1,eiλz2),λ∼λ+2π,(T10.3)(z_1,z_2)\longmapsto(e^{i\lambda}z_1,e^{i\lambda}z_2), \qquad \lambda\sim\lambda+2\pi, \tag{T10.3}

leaves n\mathbf n unchanged. Conversely, n3n_3 fixes both magnitudes and n1+in2n_1+in_2 fixes their relative phase whenever both are nonzero. Only the common phase remains. At a pole one coordinate vanishes, but the nonzero coordinate still has a full phase circle. No point is fixed by a nontrivial common phase.

Thus each inverse image π−1(n)\pi^{-1}(\mathbf n) is one circle. The map is the Hopf fibration, S1→S3⟶πS2S^1\to S^3\mathrel{\mathop{\longrightarrow}^{\pi}}S^2. Here S3S^3 is the total space, S2S^2 the base, and each circle a fiber. A principal circle bundle means that locally the total space looks like a base patch times a circle, with the circle acting freely and transitively on each fiber. We now exhibit those local products and their gluing; a global product is a stronger assertion.

Two linked Hopf fibers, drawn as blue and orange circles in stereographic projection, lie above opposite equatorial points of the base sphere. Arrows follow increasing common phase. White gaps mark depth at crossings of the drawing.

Each whole circle maps to one base point: blue to (1,0,0)(1,0,0) and orange to (−1,0,0)(-1,0,0). The fibers are disjoint in S3S^3; their planar crossings are projection overlaps, not intersections. This stereographic view and its planar drawing do not preserve the sphere’s metric distances: apparent circle sizes are not physical fiber radii. The Hopf-fibration laboratory constructs these fibers and checks the map.

Write the base coordinates as n=(sin⁡θcos⁡φ,sin⁡θsin⁡φ,cos⁡θ)\mathbf n=(\sin\theta\cos\varphi,\sin\theta\sin\varphi,\cos\theta), with 0≤θ≤π0\leq\theta\leq\pi and φ∼φ+2π\varphi\sim\varphi+2\pi. On the patch UNU_N excluding the south pole choose a representative with z1z_1 positive real:

sN(θ,φ)=(cos⁡(θ/2)eiφsin⁡(θ/2)),z=eiχNsN,χN∼χN+2π.(T10.4)s_N(\theta,\varphi)= \begin{pmatrix}\cos(\theta/2)\\e^{i\varphi}\sin(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}, \qquad z=e^{i\chi_N}s_N,\qquad\chi_N\sim\chi_N+2\pi. \tag{T10.4}

The map sNs_N is a local section: it selects one point of each fiber. On the southern patch choose instead

sS=(e−iφcos⁡(θ/2)sin⁡(θ/2)),z=eiχSsS.(T10.5)s_S=\begin{pmatrix}e^{-i\varphi}\cos(\theta/2)\\\sin(\theta/2)\end{pmatrix}, \qquad z=e^{i\chi_S}s_S. \tag{T10.5}

These representatives are smooth at their included poles. For example, sN=((1+n3)/2, (n1+in2)/2(1+n3))Ts_N=(\sqrt{(1+n_3)/2},\,(n_1+in_2)/\sqrt{2(1+n_3)})^T has no singularity near n3=1n_3=1. On the overlap,

sN=eiφsS,χS=χN+φ(mod2π).(T10.6)s_N=e^{i\varphi}s_S,\qquad \chi_S=\chi_N+\varphi\pmod{2\pi}. \tag{T10.6}

The second equation follows by representing the same zz in the two products. The circle has not acquired two independent angles. Its coordinate changes when we change which section defines zero phase.

Define the real one-form on the total space

Θ=−i(zˉ1dz1+zˉ2dz2)=y0dy1−y1dy0+y2dy3−y3dy2.(T10.7)\Theta=-i\left(\bar z_1dz_1+\bar z_2dz_2\right) =y^0dy^1-y^1dy^0+y^2dy^3-y^3dy^2. \tag{T10.7}

Reality follows from d(∣z1∣2+∣z2∣2)=0d(|z_1|^2+|z_2|^2)=0. Its polynomial ambient expression is smooth everywhere. It is exactly the earlier global-frame form η1=e1/ℓ\eta^1=e^1/\ell.

The generator of the common phase is ξ=(−y1,y0,−y3,y2)⋅∂y\xi=(-y^1,y^0,-y^3,y^2)\cdot\partial_y. Its flow parameter has period 2π2\pi, and direct substitution gives Θ(ξ)=1\Theta(\xi)=1. The form is invariant under the common phase. These two properties make Θ\Theta a normalized principal-circle connection. It specifies which displacements contain a vertical phase change; it is not an additional flavor gauge field or the R-symmetry source of the three-manifold paper.

Substituting the two local representatives gives

Θ=dχN+aN=dχS+aS,aN=1−cos⁡θ2 dφ,aS=−1+cos⁡θ2 dφ.(T10.8)\begin{aligned} \Theta&=d\chi_N+a_N=d\chi_S+a_S,\\ a_N&=\frac{1-\cos\theta}{2}\,d\varphi, &a_S&=-\frac{1+\cos\theta}{2}\,d\varphi. \end{aligned} \tag{T10.8}

For instance, in the north patch the phase derivatives contribute cos⁡2(θ/2)dχN+sin⁡2(θ/2)(dχN+dφ)\cos^2(\theta/2)d\chi_N+\sin^2(\theta/2)(d\chi_N+d\varphi); the real amplitude derivatives cancel. Equation (T10.6) then makes the two expressions for Θ\Theta identical. Downstairs the potentials differ by aN−aS=dφa_N-a_S=d\varphi, exactly the unit-flux transition of the connection lesson.

Differentiating removes the fiber coordinate:

dΘ=π∗F,F=daN=daS=12sin⁡θ dθ∧dφ.(T10.9)d\Theta=\pi^*F,\qquad F=da_N=da_S=\frac12\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\varphi. \tag{T10.9}

The notation π∗F\pi^*F means evaluate the base two-form on the projections of tangent vectors upstairs. It has no component along ξ\xi. With the outward base orientation sin⁡θ dθ∧dφ>0\sin\theta\,d\theta\wedge d\varphi>0,

c1=12π∫S2F=12π12∫0πsin⁡θ dθ∫02πdφ=1.(T10.10)\boxed{\displaystyle c_1=\frac1{2\pi}\int_{S^2}F =\frac1{2\pi}\frac12\int_0^\pi\sin\theta\,d\theta \int_0^{2\pi}d\varphi=1.} \tag{T10.10}

This is the bundle number in the declared orientation and period normalization. Equivalently, eiφe^{i\varphi} winds once around U(1)U(1) on the equator. Reversing the circle action while renormalizing its connection, or reversing the base orientation, reverses this sign.

The connection is global on S3S^3, although no single smooth potential exists on S2S^2. There is no conflict with Stokes’ theorem: the nonzero integral is over the base, where aNa_N and aSa_S are only local. In fact, a global section would pull Θ\Theta back to a global base potential with derivative FF, forcing ∫S2F=0\int_{S^2}F=0. Therefore this bundle has no global section and is not the product bundle S2×S1S^2\times S^1.

The same normalization appears in Closset–Kim, (3.90) and (8.11). We are using an ordinary smooth principal circle bundle. Their more general Seifert examples can have exceptional fibers; those require additional data and are not being assumed here.

A vertical vector points along ξ\xi and leaves the base point fixed. A vector XX is horizontal if Θ(X)=0\Theta(X)=0. Every tangent vector decomposes uniquely as X=Θ(X)ξ+[X−Θ(X)ξ]X=\Theta(X)\xi+[X-\Theta(X)\xi]. The second term is horizontal and projects to a base displacement.

In the northern coordinates, horizontal lifts of the coordinate vectors are

Hθ=∂θ,Hφ=∂φ−1−cos⁡θ2∂χN,ξ=∂χN.(T10.11)H_\theta=\partial_\theta,\qquad H_\varphi=\partial_\varphi- \frac{1-\cos\theta}{2}\partial_{\chi_N},\qquad \xi=\partial_{\chi_N}. \tag{T10.11}

Going in the base azimuthal direction generally requires compensating motion in the fiber. Their bracket exposes the twist:

[Hθ,Hφ]=−12sin⁡θ ξ,Θ([Hθ,Hφ])=−F(∂θ,∂φ).(T10.12)[H_\theta,H_\varphi] =-\frac12\sin\theta\,\xi, \qquad \Theta([H_\theta,H_\varphi])=-F(\partial_\theta,\partial_\varphi). \tag{T10.12}

Two horizontal motions can therefore generate a vertical one. The horizontal planes are transverse to the fibers, but they are not tangent planes to a family of two-dimensional surfaces upstairs. This does not prevent a smooth quotient base. More generally “transverse” need not mean that there is a global transverse slice.

For this example Θ∧dΘ\Theta\wedge d\Theta is nowhere zero; such a one-form is called a contact form. The global frame makes the statement valid even at the angular poles: Θ∧dΘ=2η1∧η2∧η3\Theta\wedge d\Theta=2\eta^1\wedge\eta^2\wedge\eta^3. An arbitrary circle-bundle connection need not have this property. No spinor-bilinear construction or transverse complex structure was needed for our calculation.

The round metric follows directly from (T10.4):

ds2=ℓ2[14dθ2+cos⁡2θ2 dχN2+sin⁡2θ2 (dχN+dφ)2]=ℓ2Θ2+ℓ24(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dφ2).(T10.13)\begin{aligned} ds^2&=\ell^2\left[\frac14d\theta^2 +\cos^2\frac\theta2\,d\chi_N^2 +\sin^2\frac\theta2\,(d\chi_N+d\varphi)^2\right]\\ &=\ell^2\Theta^2+ \frac{\ell^2}{4}\left(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\varphi^2\right). \end{aligned} \tag{T10.13}

Thus the fibers have circumference 2πℓ2\pi\ell, the unit vertical vector is ξ/ℓ\xi/\ell, and the base with its quotient metric is a round sphere of radius ℓ/2\ell/2. The dimensionless unit vector n\mathbf n did not set the physical base radius. The connection Θ\Theta is normalized by a group period; the metric-unit one-form is instead ℓΘ\ell\Theta.

The volume check keeps both radii: Vol⁡(Sℓ3)=(2πℓ) 4π(ℓ/2)2=2π2ℓ3\operatorname{Vol}(S^3_\ell)=(2\pi\ell)\,4\pi(\ell/2)^2=2\pi^2\ell^3. This agrees with the independent ambient-coordinate calculation. All of θ,φ,χN\theta,\varphi,\chi_N are dimensionless angles, while ℓ\ell has length units.

The source paper’s metric (5.11) uses an angle ψP\psi_P of period 4π4\pi. Locally ψP=2χN\psi_P=2\chi_N and its bracket is dψP+2sin⁡2(θ/2)dφ=2Θd\psi_P+2\sin^2(\theta/2)d\varphi=2\Theta. Its r=ℓr=\ell, h=1h=1 metric is consequently (T10.13). Dividing that bracket by two while keeping a 4π4\pi period, or changing the period without changing the normalization, would give a wrong fiber radius or bundle number. The paper chooses additional background fields when discussing supersymmetry; the metric dictionary here makes no such choice.

Fix 0<θ0<π0<\theta_0<\pi and traverse the base latitude once with increasing φ\varphi. A horizontal lift satisfies

0=Θ(z˙)=χ˙N+1−cos⁡θ02φ˙,ΔχN=−π(1−cos⁡θ0).(T10.14)0=\Theta(\dot z)=\dot\chi_N+ \frac{1-\cos\theta_0}{2}\dot\varphi, \qquad \Delta\chi_N=-\pi(1-\cos\theta_0). \tag{T10.14}

The base loop closes, but the point upstairs returns multiplied by e−iπ(1−cos⁡θ0)e^{-i\pi(1-\cos\theta_0)}. At θ0=π/3\theta_0=\pi/3, the return phase is −i-i: the lifted path has advanced by a quarter-circle in the negative fiber direction.

The north cap has curvature flux ∫capF=π(1−cos⁡θ0)\int_{\rm cap}F=\pi(1-\cos\theta_0), reproducing that result as e−i∫Fe^{-i\int F}. The other cap with the same oriented boundary changes the flux by 2π2\pi, leaving the phase unchanged. This is a directly observable consequence of the bundle number.

The minus sign describes the moving point of the principal bundle, since its horizontal equation is dχ=−ad\chi=-a. The convention D=d−iqaD=d-iqa for a charged field gives the opposite phase e+iq∮ae^{+iq\oint a} for its parallel components. These are compatible: if a scalar function on the total space is written as Ψ=eimχNuN\Psi=e^{im\chi_N}u_N, then (T10.6) requires uN=eimφuSu_N=e^{im\varphi}u_S, and horizontal differentiation acts as (d−imaN)uN(d-im a_N)u_N. Exercise 3 makes this useful relation explicit.

1. Shorten the fibers by an actual quotient

Section titled “1. Shorten the fibers by an actual quotient”

For an integer p≥2p\geq2, identify zz with e2πi/pze^{2\pi i/p}z. The resulting space is S3/ZpS^3/\mathbb Z_p, with the locally inherited round metric and the same Hopf base. Find a fiber angle of period 2π2\pi, its normalized connection, the bundle number, the fiber length and the volume. Explain why simply replacing Θ\Theta by pΘp\Theta on the original bundle is not the same operation.

Hint 1

On the quotient the original phase coordinate has period 2π/p2\pi/p. Use χ^=pχ\widehat\chi=p\chi and rewrite Θ\Theta in terms of it.

Hint 2

A normalized connection must evaluate to one on the generator whose flow has period 2π2\pi. The local metric is unchanged even though a fiber closes earlier.

Solution

The finite action is free, so the quotient is smooth. The angle χ^\widehat\chi has period 2π2\pi, with overlap χ^S=χ^N+pφ\widehat\chi_S=\widehat\chi_N+p\varphi. The normalized connection is Θ^=pΘ=dχ^N+paN\widehat\Theta=p\Theta=d\widehat\chi_N+p a_N. Its curvature is pFpF, so its bundle number is pp with the same base and fiber orientations. Its transition phase eipφe^{ip\varphi} is single-valued and winds pp times.

The metric becomes

ds2=ℓ2p2Θ^2+ℓ24(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dφ2).ds^2=\frac{\ell^2}{p^2}\widehat\Theta^2 +\frac{\ell^2}{4}\left(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\varphi^2\right).

Thus the fiber circumference is 2πℓ/p2\pi\ell/p, the base radius is still ℓ/2\ell/2, and the volume is 2π2ℓ3/p2\pi^2\ell^3/p. These local metric and global period statements are consistent.

On the original S3S^3, however, (pΘ)(ξ)=p(p\Theta)(\xi)=p, so pΘp\Theta is not a normalized connection for its original period-2π2\pi action. The candidate generator ξ/p\xi/p would not close after parameter 2π2\pi there. The quotient is the change that makes that generator a valid circle action. Flux numbers cannot be changed by rescaling a one-form while silently retaining the old group normalization.

2. Stretch the metric without changing the bundle

Section titled “2. Stretch the metric without changing the bundle”

On the original Hopf bundle replace the round metric by dsh2=ℓ2h2Θ2+ℓ2(dθ2+sin⁡2θ dφ2)/4ds_h^2=\ell^2h^2\Theta^2+\ell^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta\,d\varphi^2)/4, with constant h>0h>0. Compute the unit vertical vector, metric-unit vertical one-form, fiber length and volume. What happens to the horizontal distribution, the bundle number and the latitude return phase? Does this determine a supersymmetric background?

Hint 1

Keep the common phase action and its period fixed. The normalized principal connection is still Θ\Theta.

Hint 2

The horizontal condition uses ker⁡Θ\ker\Theta, while the unit-length condition uses the new metric. They answer different questions.

Solution

The unit vertical vector and one-form are respectively ξ/(ℓh)\xi/(\ell h) and ℓhΘ\ell h\Theta. The fiber circumference is 2πℓh2\pi\ell h and the volume is 2π2ℓ3h2\pi^2\ell^3h. The base metric remains the same. Both ker⁡Θ\ker\Theta and its nonintegrable bracket remain unchanged, as do FF, c1=1c_1=1, and the return phase e−iπ(1−cos⁡θ0)e^{-i\pi(1-\cos\theta_0)}.

Integrating d(ℓhΘ)d(\ell h\Theta) and calling it a Chern number would mix a length-normalized form with a period-normalized connection. The former carries a length factor; it is not the quantity in (T10.10). For positive hh, the contact condition remains nonzero as well. This is a geometric family. Preserved supersymmetry requires compatible additional sources and solutions of their spinor equations; those have not been specified by stretching the metric alone.

3. A Fourier mode becomes a charged field on the base

Section titled “3. A Fourier mode becomes a charged field on the base”

Let Ψ\Psi be a smooth complex scalar on the total space with common-phase weight mm: Ψ(eiλz)=eimλΨ(z)\Psi(e^{i\lambda}z)=e^{im\lambda}\Psi(z). Show that m∈Zm\in\mathbb Z, determine the transition and horizontal derivative of the local coefficient in Ψ=eimχiui\Psi=e^{im\chi_i}u_i, and identify its line-bundle number. As a quantitative check, use the round metric to verify −ΔS3z1=3z1/ℓ2-\Delta_{S^3}z_1=3z_1/\ell^2 from the northern coefficient uN=cos⁡(θ/2)u_N=\cos(\theta/2) of this weight-one function.

Hint 1

Use equality of the two representatives of Ψ\Psi and χS=χN+φ\chi_S=\chi_N+\varphi. Apply the horizontal lifts (T10.11) before discarding the fiber factor.

Hint 2

The scalar Laplacian is Δ=(g)−1∂μ(g gμν∂ν)\Delta=(\sqrt g)^{-1}\partial_\mu(\sqrt g\,g^{\mu\nu}\partial_\nu). Here g=ℓ3sin⁡θ/4\sqrt g=\ell^3\sin\theta/4, and the azimuthal horizontal derivative is Dφ=∂φ−im(1−cos⁡θ)/2D_\varphi=\partial_\varphi-im(1-\cos\theta)/2.

Solution

Single-valuedness under λ=2π\lambda=2\pi requires integer mm for a nonzero mode. On an overlap, eimχNuN=eim(χN+φ)uSe^{im\chi_N}u_N=e^{im(\chi_N+\varphi)}u_S, so uN=eimφuSu_N=e^{im\varphi}u_S. Horizontal differentiation gives HθΨ=eimχN∂θuNH_\theta\Psi=e^{im\chi_N}\partial_\theta u_N and HφΨ=eimχNDφuNH_\varphi\Psi=e^{im\chi_N}D_\varphi u_N. Thus uu is a charge-mm field in the connection convention of the prerequisite, with line-bundle number mm. It is generally not a single ordinary function on the base.

Inverting (T10.13) in the scalar Laplacian gives

−ΔS3Ψ=eimχNℓ2[m2−4(1sin⁡θ∂θsin⁡θ ∂θ+1sin⁡2θDφ2)]uN.-\Delta_{S^3}\Psi=\frac{e^{im\chi_N}}{\ell^2} \left[m^2-4\left( \frac1{\sin\theta}\partial_\theta\sin\theta\,\partial_\theta +\frac1{\sin^2\theta}D_\varphi^2\right)\right]u_N.

For m=1m=1, uN=cos⁡(θ/2)u_N=\cos(\theta/2), let a=(1−cos⁡θ)/2a=(1-\cos\theta)/2. The azimuthal term is −a2uN/sin⁡2θ-a^2u_N/\sin^2\theta because uNu_N is independent of φ\varphi. Writing s=sin⁡(θ/2)s=\sin(\theta/2) and c=cos⁡(θ/2)c=\cos(\theta/2), the radial term is −c/2+s2/(4c)-c/2+s^2/(4c) and the azimuthal term is −s2/(4c)-s^2/(4c). Their sum is −uN/2-u_N/2. The displayed operator therefore gives (1+2)Ψ/ℓ2(1+2)\Psi/\ell^2, as claimed. The intermediate fractions use this patch; the global function z1z_1 is smooth, including its zero at the south pole.

This also checks the base-radius factor four and the fiber-momentum term separately. Momentum around the fiber produces an effective connection charge downstairs; it has not introduced a new microscopic gauge field or a supersymmetry assumption.

The Hopf bundle now has three consistent descriptions: a common-phase quotient, two glued circle coordinates, and a global connection whose curvature integrates to one unit on the base. When a physical construction supplies a preferred vector and transverse directions, these calculations give a concrete test of what their local and global meanings can be.

Reproduce the bundle number, draw actual fibers and follow a horizontal lift in the Hopf-fibration laboratory.